Home > The Market > Renewable Energy and the Economy

Renewable Energy and the Economy

November 22nd, 2010

src=http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fc01HalhoNc/default.jpg

1 April 2009 – Dan Arvizu, director of the Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, discusses the current state of technology for renewable energy and the reaction in the U.S., and possible developments in the near future. The energy seminar meets during the academic year on Wednesday, from 4.15 bis 05.15 Clock For a list of upcoming energy seminar presentations, please visit the events listing at the Woods Institute for the Environment website. Stanford University www.stanford.edu Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford http National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Stanford University www.nrel.gov Channel on YouTube: www.youtube.com


ship Report Video Blog 14th September 2010

Categories: The Market Tags: , ,
  1. perplexfraction
    November 22nd, 2010 at 07:27 | #1

    The big bad Oil corporations r trying their best to stop free energy technology from spreading to common ppl.
    We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating ur own electricity now.
    Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!

  2. perplexfraction
    November 22nd, 2010 at 07:54 | #2

    Free Energy is real and it’s here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor

    just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it’s probably the ONLY working magnet

    motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!

  3. checksummedchest
    November 22nd, 2010 at 08:40 | #3

    Free Energy is real and it’s here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor

    just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it’s probably the ONLY working magnet

    motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!

  4. buchananfibbing
    November 22nd, 2010 at 09:21 | #4

    Free Energy is real and it’s here! The Big Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this

    information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the

    energy revolution!

  5. slipshodcoqbgg
    November 22nd, 2010 at 10:19 | #5

    The big bad Oil corporations r trying their best to stop free energy technology from spreading to common ppl.
    We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating ur own electricity now.
    Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!

  6. hungarylnnjsd
    November 22nd, 2010 at 10:30 | #6

    Free Energy is real and it’s here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor

    just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it’s probably the ONLY working magnet

    motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!

  7. polysemousncrk
    November 22nd, 2010 at 11:06 | #7

    Free Energy is real and it’s here! The Big Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this

    information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the

    revolution!

  8. slipshodcoqbgg
    November 22nd, 2010 at 11:45 | #8

    Free Energy is real and its here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor then

    just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it’s probably the ONLY working magnet

    motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!

  9. despinapjr
    November 22nd, 2010 at 12:24 | #9

    Free Energy is real and its here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor then

    just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it’s probably the ONLY working magnet

    motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!

  10. zassounotsukushi
    November 22nd, 2010 at 13:19 | #10

    “Ultimately everything starts with solar energy”

    That is incorrect. Geothermal comes from radioisotope decay in the center of the Earth. Nuclear comes from similar isotopes. You can say those come from a prior supernova, but that’s not clear when referring to ‘solar’.

    Ultimately all usable forms of energy come from the low entropy state of the big bang, but you could break that down in terms of the fundamental forces, as fusion contributes along with gravitational collapse.

  11. checksummedchest
    November 22nd, 2010 at 14:18 | #11

    The big Oil corporations are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.
    We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating ur own electricity now.
    Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!

  12. heartlessvietboy
    November 22nd, 2010 at 14:52 | #12

    It is not renewable energy, it is natural energy.

  13. flavionassis
    November 22nd, 2010 at 15:32 | #13

    watch?v=W96ou0bE4Uw

  14. SexCyberGuideCom
    November 22nd, 2010 at 16:03 | #14

    nice video

  15. newave123456
    November 22nd, 2010 at 16:21 | #15

    This was a good speech. I like these ideas alot. It actually speaks to what I have been saying for the last few years.

  16. pacificcresttrans
    November 22nd, 2010 at 16:22 | #16

    Renewable energy is one of the methods that is projected to boost world economy. World leaders are stressing on the need for renewable energy sources like wind and solar to meet the increasing energy demands. Pacific Crest Transformers manufactures liquid-filled distribution transformers which are environmentally friendly. Check the their website for more on the renewable energy market and the role of transformers.

  17. eliasmouawad
    November 22nd, 2010 at 16:47 | #17

    Search For the series
    “BUSH OBAMA DESTROYED US ARMY”
    Part 3 uploaded

  18. ytgv3fc7
    November 22nd, 2010 at 17:40 | #18

    @Xasew Clearly you have no concept of what a trade deficit really is. I hope it is not totally beyond your comprehension.
    A net increase in production in one nation and a net loss of all the gains of that production to another nation is a trade deficit.

    This is a depletion.
    And yes, in your example, the USA has lost assets as all gains go outside the USA. You don’t think so but that’s because you can’t do math.

  19. Xasew
    November 22nd, 2010 at 18:31 | #19

    @ytgv3fc7
    If e.g. Japan invests in the US to start a company, and then that company orders some of its capital equipment from outside the country then has the US lost assets? Because this scenario would grow the trade deficit believe it or not.

    A trade deficit is NOT the “depletion of a nation’s assets”; that’s nonsense.

  20. ytgv3fc7
    November 22nd, 2010 at 18:54 | #20

    @Xasew like I’m NOT WRONG NOW. Deficits are DEPLETIONS of a nations assets. Period. There’s no getting around that. People aren’t just pretending to lose assets, they are really gone. Shipped. Left the territory. That’s a deficit. Mathematically there is NOT a pattern in place for which it’s a fractional decay, and if it was THEN something would always be left behind (though perhaps not enough to be useful). Even that wouldn’t be great but the reality is much worse.

    This is NOT a theory.

  21. Xasew
    November 22nd, 2010 at 19:53 | #21

    @ytgv3fc7
    If you don’t know what trade deficits and its true implications are, I suggest you stop arguing about it. I used to think like you do, but after Murphy explained it in his article “Perpetual Trade Deficits Can Be Good” I realized that I was wrong. Like you are now.

    Read the article. Schiff is probably the best Austrian when it comes to analyzing and predicting the economy, so it’s not surprising if he makes a few theoretical mistakes(and pointing them out is not a sign of disrespect).

  22. ytgv3fc7
    November 22nd, 2010 at 20:37 | #22

    @Xasew in fact you wrote pure lies and bullshit.
    A trade deficit BY DEFINITION means you are losing your assets to the side with the surplus and BY DEFINITION it can not go on forever because you do not have infinite assets. A trade deficit of 5 billion for example means you LOST 5 billion of ASSETS and if you repeat this without a surplus to balance, you have 0. Zero. Nada. Poor. Broke. No production left. Failed state.

  23. laptoprepairs
    November 22nd, 2010 at 21:20 | #23

    Marc faber said the whole world is in a race to devalue thier currency the fastest this can only be great for precius gold

  24. gradiu3rox
    November 22nd, 2010 at 22:06 | #24

    @sabdi3 for example, japan bought something like 3 trillion dollars worth of, uhh, dollars the week before last. They basically swapped the yen for debt in dollars to try and keep the two currencies stable against each other. It is the same thing China has been doin to keep it’s money low (I think). Maybe China has some other tricks. But the thing is that the Japanese government is lending yen to America so that Americans can buy Japanese goods. The actual purchasing power is being borrowed

  25. Xasew
    November 22nd, 2010 at 22:42 | #25

    @ytgv3fc7
    In fact it doesn’t. You can have a trade deficit forever and it wouldn’t hurt you.

  26. ytgv3fc7
    November 22nd, 2010 at 22:58 | #26

    @treysparker for example: all the provinces and territories are proposing combining their drug purchases. This is tax-dollars put to work. If we all paid our own we’d pay a lot as individuals; if each province pays its own they save some money but if they all pay together ALL AT ONCE for a LARGE bulk purchase they can save an additional 10 BILLION DOLLARS. I know we hear ‘trillion’ a lot these days but not FROM Canadian budgets. Saving 10 b is good coin, good socialism.

  27. ytgv3fc7
    November 22nd, 2010 at 23:51 | #27

    @treysparker depends on the nature of the suffering. If the nature of the suffering is that there’s people unable to work but who CAN be made able, be it the problem is no housing or not enough food “for now” but it can be fixed, then socialism can fix that. If there’s too many people, not enough places to work, not enough food *no matter how it’s shared* then socialism can’t fix that. Maybe emigration can.
    Socialism stops Canada’s economy from suffering, for example.

  28. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 00:07 | #28

    @deltapunk21 in a free market there is typically ONLY such charging as OVER-charging and it is wrong, it is fraud and it must cease to exist, be punished with full seizure of all assets AND jail time.
    Free markets are fraud markets, rigged markets, it’s a mathematical certainty.

  29. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 00:09 | #29

    @mrzack888 ah of course, the usual – Americans label everything they do not understand and/or do not like as being socialist, now they have gotten moved on from using the word ‘commie’ in every 3rd sentence. You know, since communist china owns America’s ass like a pimp owns his bitches.

  30. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 00:18 | #30

    @AGL23 but actually the only way for gold IS up and it IS true, and that means the entire time it’s been pushed from 400 down to 250 there’s been fraud involved. Every time people would pretend it’s 250 / oz it isn’t. Because some of those oz’s being priced at 250 are actually non-existent. If 100 million oz’s are 250 each but in reality it’s discovered half of them don’t even exist, and will not, that changes the price on all the rest.

  31. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 01:12 | #31

    @AGL23 you can try to use some math to factor out the non-money-vector value of gold but honestly its best purpose is as money so that’s how it’s used. You certainly can invest in the sense of a commodity but gold isn’t going to move like one for a very long time. You would need to calculate the mark you’re looking for based on currencies – when the weakest paper currencies are eliminated, when people are willing to put money back into stocks, you need to be out and into real value.

  32. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 02:01 | #32

    @Icriedtoday since I’m 100x smarter than you, for you to call me stupid is a fucking joke.
    Diamonds sell for money and that means the GDP is NOT near-zero you dumb-ass.
    It doesn’t have “diamond-stores” it has NEW DIAMOND MINES. Not old mines. NEW MINES.

  33. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 02:16 | #33

    @Xasew the long-term use of a trade-deficit drains a nation’s economy of all its valuable resources until nothing is left.

  34. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 02:20 | #34

    @PostBush That’s a good point, but now I need to consider the item and the buyer. To some people jade has little value; for gold this is very much not the case. If a delicate formed item is made in jade it’s fragile and can’t be mended, whereas gold can be re-melted. Of course, metal detectors don’t work on jade ;) Pros and cons.

  35. ABETRMAN
    November 23rd, 2010 at 03:12 | #35

    @coturnix19
    What do you mean dumb blond teen gals from alabama…..
    That’s not nice……..
    But kept in contex your comment is amusing!
    Have a good one!

  36. coturnix19
    November 23rd, 2010 at 03:52 | #36

    i evision dumb blond teen gals from alabama, assembling, in sweatshops, cellphones for export in exchange for yuan bonds… that’s be fun to see

  37. wuddychunk1
    November 23rd, 2010 at 04:27 | #37

    @phillipdriscoll yeah the canary gag tickled me too…lol

  38. ytgv3fc7
    November 23rd, 2010 at 04:44 | #38

    @MaurDL ah, I guess my answer is: the worse the USD problem is, the less it will be the de facto world reserve currency thereby creating the situation whereby you can’t by imported things like oil for a reasonable price in USD. So long as you can trade in equals and get the thing you worked for, even if it’s shipped in, then paper can indeed be used as money. It’s merely highly prone to fraud. That doesn’t mean it starts as fraud. We’re far, far from that starting time.

  39. 111WLee
    November 23rd, 2010 at 05:06 | #39

    THE ANCHORS AT CNBC ARE ILLEGALLY MONITORING MY PERSONAL LIFE
    I AM NOT CRAZY I DO NOT BELIEVE IN UFOs OR CONSPIRACY THEORIES THIS IS TRULY HAPPENING TO ME AND I’M SEEKING CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST THEM.

    CLICK MY PROFILE FOR MORE INFO

  40. deltapunk21
    November 23rd, 2010 at 05:37 | #40

    they aren’t overcharging there is no such thing as overcharging in a free market also their prices and fees escpecially wconsidering schiff’s favorite imbecile moments regarding nuismatic coisn which if you bother to check the books and etc. are the market prices or in fact under the market prices.

  41. RedMarineNex
    November 23rd, 2010 at 06:15 | #41

    @kricke243 Actually no. Gold has limited industrial applications due to it’s low hardness and strength, but in those limited applications (specialist electronics for one), it is very useful, and idiots using it as a currency deprives ALL of us of those applications.
    All monetary ‘value’, which is really trade value, is a contract. Paper currency is simply a contract. If governments breach that contract, then one must simply move to another currency, which anyone can do without buying gold.

Comments are closed.